Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion KP315AA-ABU m9265.uk

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion KP315AA-ABU m9265.uk  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Benicia
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090910
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 15 '20 at 17:49
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$54
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 26.9
2-Core 54.3
36% 50.6 Pts
4-Core 81.9
8-Core 108
12% 95.2 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 310
Nvidia(10DE 1154) 1GB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 392.61
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 400GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GMDOA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 18 5.4 27 20 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 49.9
Write 54
Mixed 30
SusWrite 23.1
29% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21%
Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$31
554GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 102 104 108 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 97
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 107
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$16
345GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 94 98 98 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 108
Write 96.2
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 97.1
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 4.4
14% 4.97 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KP315AA-ABU m9265.uk Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion KP315AA-ABU m9265.uk

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $257
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback