Today's hottest deals

HP xw6400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP xw6400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A04h
Memory12.3 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101025
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 14 '20 at 07:57
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon 5140
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Memory 49.8
1-Core 26.2
2-Core 50.1
28% 42 Pts
4-Core 51.6
8-Core 50
7% 50.8 Pts
64-Core 50.7
3% 50.7 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.08% Terrible
Lighting 6.17
Reflection 6.85
Parallax 7.72
5% 6.91 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 7.17
Splatting 7.13
5% 6.16 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.08%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
662GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 97 116 132 130 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 148
Write 145
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 114
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 49GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw6400 Workstation Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw6400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback