Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-D PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81M-D PLUS  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 13 '20 at 16:09
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 94.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 216
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 403
54% 405 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 847A) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Lighting 32.9
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 44.1
27% 35.9 fps
MRender 42.6
Gravity 37.2
Splatting 34.2
31% 38 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 149 131 126 121 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 484
Write 160
Mixed 211
SusWrite 138
54% 248 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 37
156% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 186
160% 241 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 129%
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
71GB free
Firmware: CS900210
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 182 208 209 211 211 MB/s
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.6% Good
Read 257
Write 191
Mixed 206
SusWrite 195
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 25.5
117% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 132
114% 168 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
199GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 158 160 160 160 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 147
Write 131
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 158
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3 1600 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 17.9
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 18.2
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-D PLUS Builds (Compare 481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-D PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback