Today's hottest deals

Dell Latitude E6510

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemDell Latitude E6510  (all builds)
MotherboardDell
Memory10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '20 at 13:52
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 50%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 23.5
2-Core 46.7
33% 45.6 Pts
4-Core 87.9
8-Core 118
13% 103 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 3100M
Dell(1028 040B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.00
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.31% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2.77
Parallax 0.53
1% 1.56 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2.04
2% 2.09 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.31%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 145 80 29 58 54 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.6% Poor
Read 219
Write 194
Mixed 140
SusWrite 94.5
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 4.6
33% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 31.6
DQ Write 46.3
DQ Mixed 9.4
15% 29.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 60%
Ftewum 120GB
49GB free
Firmware: T061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 204 202 206 212 109 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.2% Average
Read 233
Write 196
Mixed 202
SusWrite 191
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 21.2
4K Mixed 12.7
48% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 10.8
46% 102 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 45%
USB3.0 External Device 500GB
343GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 89 88 95 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 98.2
Write 86
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 92.9
105% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 37%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D3M8GS16A8 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6510 Builds (Compare 318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback