Today's hottest deals

Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140507
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 26 '17 at 18:29
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$268
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 190
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 592
59% 481 Pts
64-Core 707
44% 707 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088
Asus(1043 8451) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
48.7% Average
Lighting 60.2
Reflection 56.8
Parallax 71.5
49% 62.8 fps
MRender 69.6
Gravity 61.6
Splatting 49
48% 60 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC480GE4DA16B-T 480GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 504ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 506
Write 235
Mixed 307
77% 349 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 9.63
49% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 20.9
DQ Write 15.4
DQ Mixed 32.6
20% 23 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 66%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$61
2TB free
Firmware: CC51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 157
Write 98.1
Mixed 126
96% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.14
57% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HDS5C4040ALE630 4TB
726GB free
Firmware: MPAOA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 64.9
Write 75.2
Mixed 90.9
59% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.15
64% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 73%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$116
626GB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 116
Write 117
Mixed 117
88% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.31
138% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$69
465GB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 157
Write 148
Mixed 140
112% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.31
100% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 1600 CL9 Series 1866 CL10 Series 1600 CL9 Series 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 18.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,005
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback