Today's hottest deals

Asus X751NV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X751NV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X751NV
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '20 at 14:15
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N4200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Memory 35.1
1-Core 48.7
2-Core 96.1
34% 60 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 184
25% 185 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505
Asus(1043 1770) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
2.53% Terrible
Lighting 2.77
Reflection 3.54
Parallax 2.78
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 4.57
Gravity 2
Splatting 4.43
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.53%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
891GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 99 105 104 98 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 85.5
Write 132
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 98.8
69% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.1
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 71%
SDHC 31GB
19GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 12 12 10 12 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 54.9
Write 6.7
Mixed 9
SusWrite 11.2
15% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1
300% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.8% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 226
18% 226 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X751NV Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X751NV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback