Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120418
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 04 '20 at 23:14
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 204
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 584
60% 483 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Zotac(19DA 1280) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.78
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.5% Poor
Lighting 30.2
Reflection 31
Parallax 39.6
25% 33.6 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 35.8
Splatting 26.4
27% 34.1 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RevuAhn_850X1TU256GB 256GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0724B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 97 96 180 136 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 359
Write 326
Mixed 274
SusWrite 126
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 27.4
85% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 59
72% 130 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
276GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 131 131 131 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 129
Write 126
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 130
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
60GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 155 174 175 175 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 168
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 160
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.5
176% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 100%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBSR Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 04CD F3-10666CL9-4GBSR 04EF Team-Elite-1600 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.1% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $531
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback