Today's hottest deals

Asrock X99 Extreme6/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme6/ac  (all builds)
Memory41.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '20 at 17:24
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 79
1-Core 119
2-Core 200
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 718
69% 568 Pts
64-Core 872
54% 872 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.5% Below average
Lighting 46.1
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 58.5
38% 45.1 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 47.3
Splatting 38.2
32% 38.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 272 206 138 129 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 464
Mixed 387
SusWrite 221
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 52.6
173% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 348
262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 134%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 24.9
Write 5.5
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 13.1
10% 14 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 159%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 F4-2400C15-8GRR F4-2400C15-8GRR F4-2400C15-8GRR F4-2400C15-8GRR 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 33.4
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme6/ac Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme6/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $441
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback