Today's hottest deals

Asus G551JW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G551JW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G551JW
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150116
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateNov 01 '20 at 13:08
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 175
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 535
54% 438 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 185D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.04% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 13
Parallax 7.12
3% 8.07 fps
MRender 8.67
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8.22
5% 6.44 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.04%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SMSM151S3128GD 128GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM01.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 40 53 50 38 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 375
Write 48.3
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 48.6
28% 130 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 3.2
37% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 36.2
DQ Mixed 13.4
25% 51.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 59%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
561GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 99 102 102 102 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 104
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 102
59% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.4% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 10.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 12.8
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G551JW Builds (Compare 669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G551JW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback