PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Emachines ET1810 (all builds) |
Motherboard | eMachines EMCP73VT-PM |
Memory | 1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090429 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 27 '20 at 01:52 |
Run Duration | 244 Seconds |
Run User | DOM-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
33.9%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
EVGA(3842 1302) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
|
0.59%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$49
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 40 31 37 39 40 MB/s
|
23.2%
Poor
|
|||
WD WD400BB-60DGA0 40GB
3GB free
Firmware: 14.03G14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 33 33 32 33 32 MB/s
|
22.3%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate ST3120213AS 120GB
9GB free
Firmware: 3.AHL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 41 35 37 39 42 MB/s
|
26.5%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate ST380011AS 80GB
9GB free
Firmware: 3.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 50 50 49 50 50 MB/s
|
26.3%
Poor
|
|||
WD WD800BB-88JHC0 80GB
5GB free
Firmware: 05.01C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 33 33 33 33 32 MB/s
|
20.3%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung HD083GJ 80GB
21GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 50 50 49 50 50 MB/s
|
35.3%
Below average
|
|||
Jmicron Generic 250GB
30GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 18 18 17 MB/s
|
12.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
2GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.4 3.7 3.9 4.1 3.6 MB/s
|
4.57%
Terrible
|
|||
PNY USB 3.0 FD 124GB
11GB free, PID 00d9
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 13 16 16 MB/s
|
9.66%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
10.9%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E7300Intel $28Bench 39%, 7,475 samples | 1x |
Pentium D 2.66GHzIntel $129Bench 26%, 394 samples | 1x |
Core2 Quad Q9500IntelBench 48%, 5,111 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $28 |