Today's hottest deals

Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER CASPER NIRVANA NOTEBOOK
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '20 at 12:46
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3050
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Memory 22
1-Core 19.3
2-Core 34.3
16% 25.2 Pts
4-Core 26.8
8-Core 28
4% 27.4 Pts
64-Core 28.5
2% 28.5 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 27%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Device(1B0A 2292) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4300
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 1.96
Parallax 1.94
1% 1.76 fps
MRender 2.24
Gravity 1.43
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.12 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 147 196 212 212 202 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.4% Average
Read 176
Write 148
Mixed 171
SusWrite 188
39% 171 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 23
71% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 90.6
DQ Mixed 95.8
72% 96 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 2.3
11% 3.9 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 2.6
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 306
13% 306 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback