Today's hottest deals

Mitac PH12SI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics6.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMitac PH12SI  (all builds)
MotherboardMiTAC PH12SI
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '20 at 09:07
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7101TE
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22.6% Poor
Memory 13.9
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 115
34% 66.5 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 175
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Device(1071 0758) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7990
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.66% Terrible
Lighting 7.07
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 7.06
6% 8.26 fps
MRender 8.57
Gravity 5.63
Splatting 14.8
8% 9.66 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.66%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 320GB-$54
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 60 67 78 80 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 72.4
Write 80
Mixed 48
SusWrite 67.9
49% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 50%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
191GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 63 62 63 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 35.8
Write 27.2
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 61.8
27% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905711-004.A00G 9905711-007.A00G 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.3% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 10.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 5.7
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 369
11% 369 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback