Today's hottest deals

Koloe X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardKoloe X58  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 0.000976563 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 17:32
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5660
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 140
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 460
45% 371 Pts
64-Core 531
33% 531 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$72
CLim: 1281 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Lighting 66.7
Reflection 65.5
Parallax 79.2
54% 70.5 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 62
Splatting 54.9
49% 61 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS600M256C 256GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0723A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 229 234 234 234 232 MB/s
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.1% Good
Read 259
Write 235
Mixed 234
SusWrite 233
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 23.1
95% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 43.6
68% 129 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 98%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 23.1
Write 6.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 6.6
11% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.2
154% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
MXIC 25L8005 1x33GB
1 of 7 slots used
33GB FLASH 33 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.1% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Koloe X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback