Today's hottest deals

MSI 970A-G43 (MS-7693)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970A-G43 (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '17 at 13:04
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 134
61% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 431
41% 339 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36% Below average
Lighting 45.1
Reflection 49.7
Parallax 52.8
37% 49.2 fps
MRender 49.5
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 39
34% 42.7 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.03E03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 85
Write 84.5
Mixed 66.7
59% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.33
86% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 58%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB
10GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.86% Terrible
Read 22.4
Write 15.3
Mixed 18.4
23% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.24
4K Write 0.17
4K Mixed 0.02
18% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.86%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 9905474-050.A00LF 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 7.9
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-G43 (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 639 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970A-G43 (MS-7693) - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $257
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback