Today's hottest deals

Biostar A960D+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar A960D+  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '20 at 12:20
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X2 511
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 83.1
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 94.4
50% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 93.1
8-Core 95.1
12% 94.1 Pts
64-Core 94.5
6% 94.5 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Elitegroup(1019 1026) 1GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 442.80
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 16.5
15% 16.9 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 16.4
15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 320GB-$54
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 39 21 50 56 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 61.4
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 43.2
35% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
23.6% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A960D+ Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback