Today's hottest deals

Alienware Area-51m

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAlienware Area-51m  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware Area-51m
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200707
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateOct 07 '20 at 07:21
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$380
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Memory 86.5
1-Core 153
2-Core 299
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 972
96% 785 Pts
64-Core 1,453
90% 1,453 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 99%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile)
Dell(1028 08C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 159
Reflection 159
Parallax 168
129% 162 fps
Gravity 141
Splatting 109
108% 125 fps
Poor: 90% Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1275 1291 1287 1207 1237 1284 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,086
Write 1,250
Mixed 1,004
SusWrite 1,264
260% 1,151 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 51.8
170% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 1,036
DQ Write 859
DQ Mixed 954
713% 950 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 216%
Great: 372%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
85GB free
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 63 63 72 70 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 51.4
Write 93.2
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 68
49% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.3% Very good
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 24.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 26
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Area-51m Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

System: Alienware Area-51m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback