Today's hottest deals

Asus H61M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H61M-K  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '20 at 11:59
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 78%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$79
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 167
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 322
43% 321 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 4.19
4% 4.3 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 3.93
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.75 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
903GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 97 128 106 156 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 145
Write 122
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 118
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.3
88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 113%
Generic External 160GB
56GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 22 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 31
Write 27.2
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 27
36% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Alketron 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.7
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback