Today's hottest deals

Packard imedia S2110

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard imedia S2110  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard imedia S2110
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '20 at 18:14
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
27.2% Poor
Memory 49.1
1-Core 15.7
2-Core 33.6
24% 32.8 Pts
4-Core 33.9
8-Core 34.2
4% 34.1 Pts
64-Core 29.9
2% 29.9 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
Acer(1025 0592) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.35
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.2 fps
MRender 1.24
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 119 112 62 52 61 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.5% Below average
Read 214
Write 132
Mixed 177
SusWrite 91.8
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 22.8
4K Mixed 15.6
58% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 84.5
DQ Write 77.2
DQ Mixed 79.8
60% 80.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
441GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 92 102 108 95 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 99.1
Write 99.4
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 101
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 2.2
6% 2.23 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical imedia S2110 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S2110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $275WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback