Today's hottest deals

Asus Z87-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z87-A  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 01 '20 at 17:43
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 196
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 573
57% 464 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 34 22 32 27 34 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.2% Average
Read 274
Write 40.5
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 31.2
23% 108 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 25.5
73% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 46.4
DQ Mixed 45.7
46% 76.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 100%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
174GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 942 941 832 754 757 754 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 2,379
Write 2,155
Mixed 1,734
SusWrite 830
397% 1,774 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 77.1
252% 84.7 MB/s
DQ Read 920
DQ Write 468
DQ Mixed 704
520% 697 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 255%
Great: 346%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
149GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 76 75 75 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 107
Write 101
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 76.2
68% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 59%
Prolific USB-SATA Bridge 4TB
3TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 157 154 157 155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 153
Write 151
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 155
176% 132 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
153% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 65%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
211GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 37
Write 38.2
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 39
49% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.2% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-A Builds (Compare 3,025 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z87-A - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $732
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback