Today's hottest deals

Microelectronics G434

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics76.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicroelectronics G434  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S/ac
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191121
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateOct 01 '20 at 03:59
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9700K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$205
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 146
2-Core 294
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 1,003
95% 789 Pts
64-Core 1,051
65% 1,051 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.5% Very good
Lighting 92
Reflection 132
Parallax 88.4
75% 104 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 95.1
Splatting 68.5
80% 102 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 123%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
730GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 676 1101 1281 980 718 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 998
Write 1,048
Mixed 833
SusWrite 818
208% 924 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 60.1
185% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 627
DQ Write 913
DQ Mixed 270
344% 603 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 182%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD416E82-3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 22.9
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 28.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G434 Builds (Compare 269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

System: Microelectronics G434

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $574
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback