Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '20 at 21:02
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 218
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 430
60% 442 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 26.20.13031.18002
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.77% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 29
Parallax 30.7
0% 19.9 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 30.9
23% 27.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 7.77%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
895GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 156 163 172 174 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 178
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 169
103% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
193GB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 104 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 98.8
Write 69.2
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 104
108% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-082.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.2
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $273
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $105Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback