Today's hottest deals

Asus H61M-A/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H61M-A/BR  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140624
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '20 at 19:10
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 95
2-Core 188
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 374
48% 365 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 841B) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.38
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.9% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 5.62
20% 19.9 fps
MRender 26.9
Gravity 34.2
Splatting 30.4
25% 30.5 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.03B04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 71 69 70 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 106
Write 101
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 70
64% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 64%
Samsung HD080HJ/P 80GB-$25
13GB free
Firmware: ZH100-51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 36 36 36 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 0.3
Write 46
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 36.2
15% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0
28% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown L17004/2012 2M 0194 SH564128FH8N0QNSCG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.9% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-A/BR Builds (Compare 536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-A/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback