Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20202

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemLenovo 20202  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '20 at 23:15
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 158
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 374
41% 326 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3904) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3277
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.67% Terrible
Lighting 3.27
Reflection 7.15
Parallax 1.62
3% 4.02 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.57
3% 3.11 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.67%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
603GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 51 56 78 57 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 14.4
Write 62.4
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 57.1
29% 40 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
39% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 59%
SDHC Card 16GB
9GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.15% Terrible
Read 25.3
Write 9
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 10.5
16% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
55% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.15%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT325S6CFR8C-PB HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 17.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20202 Builds (Compare 522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20202

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback