Today's hottest deals

Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130909
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 06 '17 at 13:35
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 208
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 396
53% 395 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Dell(1028 0577) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3040
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 1.44
2% 1.67 fps
MRender 3.76
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.52
2% 2.79 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 106
Write 95.2
Mixed 92.5
74% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.59
108% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 88%
Imation Nano Pro 16GB
3GB free, PID 043c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
6.03% Terrible
Read 16.9
Write 10.1
Mixed 11.2
15% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.58
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
22% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.03%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 18.1
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 12,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback