Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite C650D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite C650D  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory0.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110628
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 13 '20 at 20:55
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II P340-$50
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 82.1
1-Core 29.1
2-Core 55.3
40% 55.5 Pts
4-Core 63.6
8-Core 64.5
9% 64.1 Pts
64-Core 64.9
4% 64.9 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Toshiba(1179 FDE4) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
0.24% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.49 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 1.22
1% 0.74 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.24%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$32
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 16 12 18 19 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
7.54% Terrible
Read 7.4
Write 15.8
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 18.6
10% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 7.54%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B2873FHS-CF8 M471B5773CHS-CH9 3GB
1066, 1066 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.3% Very poor
MC Read 1.9
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 5.7
10% 3.63 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 1.8
7% 2.57 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C650D Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C650D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback