PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | Asus V-P8H67E (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK V-P8H67E |
Memory | 11.3 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20120216 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 13 '20 at 13:49 |
Run Duration | 209 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.1%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 378E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 43 45 50 35 35 MB/s
|
30.5%
Below average
|
|||
Intenso USB 3.0 device 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 13 13 14 13 MB/s
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
396GB free, PID ce23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 5TB
4TB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 133 130 129 137 MB/s
|
57.9%
Above average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
1GB free, PID ce23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
||||
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2TB free, PID 3312
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
10.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 67 55 58 52 65 MB/s
|
46.6%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
48.6%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $158Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 42x |
Core i5-2400Intel $79Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 25x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 14x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 19x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 11x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Good | Total price: $183 |