Today's hottest deals

Technopc PROPC H310-84810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemTechnopc PROPC H310-84810  (all builds)
MotherboardTECHNOPC H310MPRVDHPLS
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190408
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateSep 13 '20 at 12:02
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 245
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 731
76% 611 Pts
64-Core 730
45% 730 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Asus(1043 0553) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 25
15% 23.3 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 17.3
Splatting 28.9
20% 24.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biostar S120-128GB 128GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 61 45 47 46 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 364
Write 87.2
Mixed 24
SusWrite 47.4
28% 131 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 18.4
71% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 52
DQ Write 26.1
DQ Mixed 14.5
17% 30.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 104%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
62GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 101 76 72 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 106
Write 112
Mixed 60
SusWrite 86.3
67% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB8GU2400.C8ET 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.5% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 12.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback