Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardXLZ X99Z-V500
Memory29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20200414
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 15:21
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 195
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 776
67% 573 Pts
64-Core 1,565
97% 1,565 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$47
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 170 171 174 186 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 181
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 175
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
12GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 3.7 6.8 5.3 6.5 6.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
7.83% Terrible
Read 19
Write 3.8
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 5.7
9% 8.45 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.4
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.83%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0-YK0 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18.6
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback