Today's hottest deals

Clevo W240EL/W250ELQ/W270ELQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemClevo W240EL/W250ELQ/W270ELQ  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO W240EL/W250ELQ/W270ELQ
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '20 at 14:17
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B980
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 83.3
1-Core 62.9
2-Core 116
55% 87.6 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 123
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 0240) 775MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.13
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 1
1% 1.19 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 1.37
Splatting 2.09
1% 1.71 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Diss 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 64 66 66 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 366
Write 233
Mixed 278
SusWrite 79.3
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 15.6
70% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 183
144% 203 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
26.8% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 0.6
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W240EL/W250ELQ/W270ELQ Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo W240EL/W250ELQ/W270ELQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback