Today's hottest deals

MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C09
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 06 '20 at 21:53
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$134
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 756
76% 620 Pts
64-Core 753
47% 753 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1342 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 67
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 83.2
55% 73.2 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 66.9
Splatting 57.1
52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$68
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 194 201 207 207 206 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 418
Mixed 386
SusWrite 227
85% 382 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 55.8
188% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 118
150% 269 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 108%
Great: 118%
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$30
44GB free
Firmware: P1021A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 278 203 80 72 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 435
Mixed 386
SusWrite 195
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 48.9
171% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 269
215% 300 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 127%
Seagate ST31000524NS 1TB-$59
516GB free
Firmware: SN12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 131 131 131 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 129
Write 132
Mixed 67
SusWrite 130
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
199% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 75%
Seagate BUP Slim 320GB
93GB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 86.9
Write 77.9
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 85.3
50% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.2
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 6,702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback