Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN517-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN517-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Karoq_CMS
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200319
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 06 '20 at 03:38
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 64.2
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 166
60% 106 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 382
43% 337 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 143F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.73% Terrible
Lighting 2.83
Reflection 49.6
Parallax 2.88
2% 18.4 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 5.57
4% 4.19 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.73%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GB
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21103900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 627 417 425 417 420 419 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 786
Write 1,297
Mixed 925
SusWrite 454
196% 865 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 32.8
116% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 683
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 45.5
138% 312 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 115%
Great: 217%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.M16FJ 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.8% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 22.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN517-52 Builds (Compare 3,510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN517-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback