Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Sleekbook 15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Sleekbook 15  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 193C
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130221
Uptime3 Days
Run DateSep 04 '20 at 18:48
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4555M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Memory 34.4
1-Core 40.5
2-Core 48.2
26% 41 Pts
4-Core 73.9
8-Core 68.7
10% 71.3 Pts
64-Core 81.4
5% 81.4 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600G
HP(103C 193C) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.24% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 3.81
0% 2.78 fps
MRender 3.76
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 5.57
4% 4.21 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.24%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
606GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 82 67 76 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 78.7
Write 97
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 79.6
52% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.3% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 6.6
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 230
17% 230 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Sleekbook 15 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Sleekbook 15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback