Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics63.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '20 at 00:39
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 264
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 681
69% 557 Pts
64-Core 684
42% 684 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
Asus(1043 8769) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.8% Good
Lighting 84.6
Reflection 79.8
Parallax 74
69% 79.4 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 58.1
54% 66.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$110
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1154 829 826 834 834 837 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 2,021
Write 2,033
Mixed 1,675
SusWrite 886
371% 1,654 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 63.1
204% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1168
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 413
391% 637 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 232%
Great: 297%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
25GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 11 9 11 9.6 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 96.3
Write 17.7
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 10.6
41% 39.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
84% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 28%
SanDisk Cruzer 4GB
2GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 9 9.1 8.7 9 9.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
8.81% Terrible
Read 31.1
Write 8.7
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 8.9
14% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
37% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.81%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 34.6
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 33.3
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 132% - Outstanding Total price: $294
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback