Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80EC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80EC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5B3
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit väriä, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140911
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 11 '20 at 08:49
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7100 APU (2014 M.Ka)
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 56.6
1-Core 47.7
2-Core 55.2
36% 53.2 Pts
4-Core 98
8-Core 97.8
13% 97.9 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3830) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 0
Reflection 6.27
Parallax 4.53
0% 3.6 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 3.17
Splatting 7.13
4% 5.32 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
851GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 78 94 93 84 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 93
Write 102
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 88.4
63% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.1% Poor
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 11.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 8.3
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80EC Builds (Compare 233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80EC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback