| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 68.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock B365M IB-R (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190726 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 07 '20 at 03:05 |
| Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 51% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
84%
Excellent
|
80% 146 Pts
|
71% 560 Pts
|
39% 624 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
68.8%
Good
|
74% 80.7 fps
|
59% 71.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apacer AS340 240GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 74 89 47 81 65 MB/s
|
30.6%
Below average
|
35% 158 MB/s
|
38% 10.2 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
288GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 20 21 18 23 31 MB/s
|
19.4%
Very poor
|
33% 45 MB/s
|
26% 0.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 78.C1GS7.AUW0B 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.8%
Below average
|
33% 11.5 GB/s
|
19% 6.5 GB/s
|
51% 78.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B365M IB-R Builds (Compare 3,503 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B365M IB-R
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-9700FIntel $269Bench 92%, 54,980 samples | 2,350x |
| Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 920x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $235Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 68x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 319,148 samples | 1,259x |
| GTX 1660Nvidia $209Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 744x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $225Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 555x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 90% - Outstanding | Total price: $539 |