Today's hottest deals

Asus P5N-D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5N-D  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '20 at 04:28
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 28.7
2-Core 56.3
38% 53.8 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 114
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Diamond(1092 6450) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 2.19
Parallax 2
0% 1.43 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 1.78
1% 1.75 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU 635 240GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 45 101 102 104 104 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.7% Above average
Read 129
Write 102
Mixed 14.3
SusWrite 77.3
58% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.3
218% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
1TB free
Firmware: ML6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 88 122 121 122 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 77.8
Write 120
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 115
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 73%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 27 36 36 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 33.6
Write 31.8
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 34.6
44% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 4.6
15% 5.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5N-D Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5N-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $446
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback