Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH317-53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PH317-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Alphard_CFS
Memory19.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '20 at 19:26
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User KWT-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 133
2-Core 255
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 788
75% 621 Pts
64-Core 1,044
65% 1,044 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Acer(1025 1342) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5177
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.6% Excellent
Lighting 99.1
Reflection 103
Parallax 94.2
81% 98.6 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 91.5
Splatting 88.4
83% 104 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN720 SED 1TB
877GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10103100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1473 1405 1413 1404 1413 1415 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,174
Write 2117
Mixed 1,643
SusWrite 1,421
361% 1,588 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 57.3
191% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,187
DQ Write 769
DQ Mixed 939
711% 965 MB/s
Poor: 171%
This bench: 237%
Great: 258%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 23.9
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 24.3
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH317-53 Builds (Compare 1,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH317-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback