Today's hottest deals

Asrock H61M-VS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VS  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120910
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 22 '20 at 21:53
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$79
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 169
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 330
43% 322 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
EVGA(3842 1257) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46.5% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 52.1
Parallax 49.6
48% 53.5 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 49.1
Splatting 48.4
44% 53.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$30
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U21010RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 194 208 210 215 215 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.6% Average
Read 221
Write 199
Mixed 164
SusWrite 202
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 9.4
69% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 26.1
DQ Write 96.3
DQ Mixed 11.4
23% 44.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 78%
Hua721010kla330 EIT 1TB
603GB free
Firmware: GKAOAB1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 54 56 58 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 22
Write 55.7
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 54.2
28% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
74% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 47%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
444GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 66 65 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 69
Write 70
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 64.7
46% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8502 PSD34G13332 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 12.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VS Builds (Compare 384 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $74
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback