Today's hottest deals

MSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A69
MotherboardMSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 2560 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '20 at 13:14
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$83
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 237
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 450
55% 424 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Lighting 66
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 56.4
54% 62.6 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 61.4
Splatting 62.7
53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 33 21 23 107 129 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-041.A00G 9905702-120.A00G 9905678-041.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 11.2
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69) Builds (Compare 1,945 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $299
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback