Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive26.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-DS2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '20 at 21:42
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 101
2-Core 168
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 587
49% 426 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 239GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 3.5 49 135 30 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.6% Poor
Read 273
Write 146
Mixed 176
SusWrite 74.7
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 0
39% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 18.4
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 14
11% 16 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 99%
Amd-raid ST1000DM010-2EP1 1TB
549GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 126 88 80 92 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 184
Write 176
Mixed 39
SusWrite 100
90% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 114%
Amd-raid WDC WD10EURX-63F 1TB
584GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 68 65 71 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.1% Above average
Read 110
Write 121
Mixed 68
SusWrite 74.8
69% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$69
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 27.7
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 22.7
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $384
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback