Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150917
Uptime21.2 Days
Run DateMar 10 '17 at 22:24
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2660 0
CPU socket #0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
34.8% Below average
Memory 27.1
1-Core 47.8
2-Core 86.8
30% 53.9 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 239
33% 242 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 448MB
Driver: vm3dum64.dll Ver. 8.15.1.32
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
4.09% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 9.38
6% 9.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.09%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 21GB
5GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 365
Write 357
Mixed 570
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 8.02
4K Mixed 10.7
32% 9.36 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 81.2
DQ Mixed 61.8
55% 84.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 87%
Vmware Virtual disk 4GB
3GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 302
Write 190
Mixed 303
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 5.01
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 8.93
24% 7.58 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 60
DQ Mixed 30.9
36% 64.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 59%
Vmware Virtual disk 75GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 112
Write 122
Mixed 156
99% 130 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 3.07
4K Mixed 2.83
550% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 64 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 5.7
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 272
15% 272 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $143
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback