Today's hottest deals

Samsung 305V4A/305V5A/3415VA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
CPU throttled at 85% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 305V4A/305V5A/3415VA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 305V4A/305V4A
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 26 '20 at 04:48
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 85%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3510MX APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 47.6
1-Core 21.3
2-Core 40.8
25% 36.6 Pts
4-Core 75.7
8-Core 77.5
10% 76.6 Pts
64-Core 79.3
5% 79.3 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6620G
Sanyo(144D C608) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1003
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 3.41
3% 3.85 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 2.87
Splatting 4.09
3% 3.59 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HN-M750MBB 750GB-$58
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 48 45 48 61 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 54.5
Write 53
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 52.2
35% 47.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
22.8% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 7.3
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 5
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 305V4A/305V5A/3415VA Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 305V4A/305V5A/3415VA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback