Today's hottest deals

Medion MS-7707

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion MS-7707  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7707
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111018
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 24 '20 at 11:07
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 145
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 287
35% 270 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
MSI(1462 2362) 512MB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 390.77
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.6% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 8.96
Parallax 6.06
6% 7.54 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 7.43
Splatting 9.26
7% 9.01 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.6%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$30
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 64 56 58 53 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 468
Write 348
Mixed 149
SusWrite 84
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 29.1
96% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 91.1
DQ Mixed 109
102% 164 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 82%
Generic SD MS Reader 16GB
14GB free, PID 6360
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 9.8 10 10 9 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.41% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 3.7
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 9.3
10% 9.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.41%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7707 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Medion MS-7707

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback