Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160325
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 21 '20 at 00:03
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 131
2-Core 241
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 724
72% 584 Pts
64-Core 712
44% 712 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.3% Very good
Lighting 94.6
Reflection 113
Parallax 106
77% 105 fps
MRender 98.8
Gravity 102
Splatting 104
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,723
Write 4,360
Mixed 5,157
1,269% 5,746 MB/s
4K Read 614
4K Write 251
4K Mixed 298
1,446% 388 MB/s
DQ Read 1,479
DQ Write 842
DQ Mixed 1,038
805% 1,120 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Adata S511 60GB
31GB free
Firmware: 319ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 64 66 77 69 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 396
Write 80
Mixed 126
SusWrite 68.7
36% 168 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 37.4
137% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 79.4
DQ Mixed 90.1
68% 91.7 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 66%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$40
116GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 461 465 460 457 392 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 470
Mixed 427
SusWrite 448
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 52.5
175% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 293
240% 341 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 118%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$142
378GB free
Firmware: CC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 59 63 39 44 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 95
Write 92
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 50.6
54% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
175% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.5% Average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.7
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $776
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback