PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus F1A55-M LE (all builds) |
Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110818 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Jun 15 '20 at 17:07 |
Run Duration | 180 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
32.2%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$91
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
|
28.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 150 179 182 200 185 MB/s
|
41.5%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
98GB free
Firmware: KC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 83 84 84 77 MB/s
|
51.2%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
127GB free, PID 61b7
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 29 29 28 MB/s
|
16.2%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 2TB
58GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 30 30 31 30 MB/s
|
16.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
20GB free, PID 61b7
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 30 31 32 31 MB/s
|
19.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905403-439.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.9%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples | 8x |
A6-3670 APUAMDBench 46%, 2,400 samples | 6x |
A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples | 6x |
Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples | 5x |
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |