Today's hottest deals

Asus F1A55-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F1A55-M LE  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110818
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 15 '20 at 17:07
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80
FM1 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 77.9
35% 56.5 Pts
4-Core 78.8
8-Core 78.8
11% 78.8 Pts
64-Core 81
5% 81 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$91
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Lighting 34.9
Reflection 26
Parallax 32.7
28% 31.2 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 34.1
Splatting 33.9
29% 35.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 150 179 182 200 185 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.5% Average
Read 197
Write 190
Mixed 180
SusWrite 174
42% 185 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 23.9
4K Mixed 20.1
66% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 70.5
DQ Mixed 42.6
35% 48.5 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
98GB free
Firmware: KC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 83 84 84 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 96.8
Write 95.7
Mixed 41
SusWrite 82
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 88%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
127GB free, PID 61b7
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 29 29 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 23.3
Write 25
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 28.2
34% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 56%
WD Elements 2TB
58GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 30 30 31 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 28.8
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 29.8
38% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 44%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
20GB free, PID 61b7
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 30 31 32 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 24.8
Write 26
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 30.2
37% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-439.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.9% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 7.5
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A55-M LE Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback