Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 705 G1 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G1 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2215
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20141022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '20 at 14:20
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8 PRO-7600B R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 82.4
45% 69.8 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 181
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
Sapphire(174B 3000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 1.96
Parallax 1.62
1% 1.65 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.87
1% 1.52 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 1%
AMD Radeon R7
HP(103C 2215) 448MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1001
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Lighting 7.13
Reflection 8.23
Parallax 9.81
6% 8.39 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 7.83
6% 7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.82%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 59 37 59 50 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 11
Write 27.2
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 46.4
17% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST3400633AS 400GB-$155
299GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 26 28 26 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 30.8
Mixed 26
SusWrite 27
21% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
86% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.7% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 13.1
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.4
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G1 MT Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G1 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback