PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20161118 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 10 '20 at 23:00 |
Run Duration | 230 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$91
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67
|
27.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 91 71 31 55 60 MB/s
|
31.9%
Below average
|
|||
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$30
86GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 93 72 32 55 61 MB/s
|
39.4%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba P300 3TB-$125
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 151 147 154 160 146 MB/s
|
77.1%
Very good
|
|||
WD My Book 1140 2TB
135GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
11.2%
Very poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
112GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 12 12 12 12 14 MB/s
|
||||
Seagate Portable 5TB
4TB free, PID 2343
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
14.2%
Very poor
|
|||
USB2.0 Flash Disk 0GB
0GB free, PID 2018
Operating at USB 1.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 MB/s
|
0.51%
Terrible
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
28GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 MB/s
|
1.51%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3
|
42.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 444x |
FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 299x |
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 179x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 183x |
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples | 89x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $91Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 87x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $174 |