Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x7-Z8700 2,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	29.9% Poor	Memory 48.6 1-Core 23.1 2-Core 46.5 27% 39.4 Pts	4-Core 66.6 8-Core 66.1 9% 66.3 Pts	64-Core 67.5 4% 67.5 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4568 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.73% Terrible	Lighting 1.77 Reflection 2.46 Parallax 2.38 1% 2.2 fps	MRender 2.76 Gravity 1.73 Splatting 3.61 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.73% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Asmt 2115 240GB 296 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 76GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 405 Write 133 Mixed 201 54% 246 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 9.05 4K Mixed 5.45 36% 10.2 MB/s	DQ Read 52.6 DQ Write 12 DQ Mixed 6.9 12% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 66%
Toshiba 064G70 63GB 159 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.0 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Read 150 Write 86.5 Mixed 111 26% 116 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 30.1 4K Mixed 9.07 54% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 18.1 DQ Write 30.3 DQ Mixed 8.54 11% 19 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 2x2GB 7,517 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.5% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8.7 24% 8.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM