Today's hottest deals

Asus P5NT WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5NT WS  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '17 at 15:18
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$54
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.75 GHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 73.7
1-Core 31.5
2-Core 63.2
39% 56.1 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 107
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 341.44
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.7% Below average
Lighting 42.6
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 50.8
35% 44.3 fps
MRender 56.2
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 36.8
35% 43.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X411
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.1% Average
Read 232
Write 136
Mixed 143
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 12.1
77% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 89.2
DQ Write 51.8
DQ Mixed 28.1
32% 56.4 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
36GB free
Firmware: 01.0
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 97.5
Mixed 93.8
73% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.18
98% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 87%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
334GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 25.4
Write 25.4
Mixed 23.2
32% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.27
81% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 4
13% 4.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 93
43% 93 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5NT WS Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5NT WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $560
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback