Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 216C
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131023
Uptime15.8 Days
Run DateJun 03 '20 at 12:59
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-4655M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 56.1
1-Core 37.5
2-Core 64.6
34% 52.7 Pts
4-Core 92.8
8-Core 91.4
12% 92.1 Pts
64-Core 89.1
6% 89.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7620G
HP(103C 216C) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1201.0
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
2.09% Terrible
Lighting 2.53
Reflection 3.15
Parallax 2.78
2% 2.82 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 2.63
Splatting 3.17
2% 2.51 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.09%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$34
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 70 38 70 69 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 53.3
Write 72
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 59.1
38% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 4.6
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 4,324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback